Access: Institutional Access
Publication year
2019study description
Test development and pilot.core topic(s)
Early LiteracyPopulation Characteristics
Toddler/PreschoolExposures, Outcomes, Other
Language and Literacy Development , School Readiness and Educational Outcomes , Screening and Tools , Validity, Reliability, Feasibility, and Acceptabilitymetric(s)
Get Ready to Read! (GRTR)Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT)
Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP)
objectives
To develop a brief screening test for ELS delays, the Early Literacy Skills Assessment Tool (ELSAT).exposure
Early Literacy Skills Assessment (ESLAT).outcomes evaluated
ESLAT psychometric properties and reliability.setting
This study included 4-year-old, typically developing, English language predominant children attending preschool.methods
The ELSAT comprised 63 items relating to 3 main ELS domains and was piloted with 21 children. After we excluded items that were nondiscriminatory, 57 items remained and were administered to 96 children. Items were compared with reference measures of ELS (Get Ready to Read-Revised), and language (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-4 and Phonological Awareness from the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing-2). Within-domain reliability was calculated for each of the 3 ELS domains and item correlations between all ELSAT items and the reference measures were calculated.sample size
n=21 (children piloted); n=96 (children post pilot)measures
ELSAT Measure: 57 items (63 piloted) relating to 3 main ELS domains:
-
- print concepts and word awareness.
- alphabet knowledge.
- phonological awareness (letter sound association, rhyming, and word segmentation).
Measures for Reference Comparison:
-
- Get Ready to Read-Revised (ELS measure).
- Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-2 (receptive language measure).
- Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (Ellison, blending words, sound matching subtests).
results
A final set of 10 items was retained that represented all 3 ELS domains and that maximized correlations with reference measures. Cronbach alpha for the refined 10-item ELSAT was 0.868; correlations between individual items and a composite of the reference measures ranged from 0.409 to 0.617 (all Ps < .01). In a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, a cut-off score of ≤5 predicted a below-average score for any of the reference measures with sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 71.4%, and area under the curve of 0.872.conclusions
The 10-item ELSAT shows strong psychometric properties and with further validation may prove valuable in screening preschool children for ELS delays.limitations
The findings are not yet generalizable to other populations, given that the sample size was small and limited to children attending preschool. Children from non−English-speaking families were not included. Further validation with larger and more diverse populations and longitudinal follow-up to determine predictive validity are necessary next steps. Furthermore, we used item statistics to identify a subset of efficient items, and some loss of generalizability may occur as a result. However, our choice of items in the final ELSAT measure was based substantially on content validity, by identifying an optimal set of items from a priori content domains that were also empirically supported in our analyses. Feasibility and acceptability of the ELSAT in pediatric practices should also be studied in follow-up research.Related