Access: FREE/Open Access
evaluation focus
Phonological Processing Abilitiesapplicable ages
Grade: Preschool-12; 48-299 months; 4-24 yearsavailable language(s)
Englishavailability
Must be purchasedsummary
The Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP) is an instrument that can be used to measure phonological processing abilities of school aged children. This instrument employs a variety of subtests to measure several components of phonological processing.
5 Composites:
-
- Phonological Awareness Component Scores (PACS)
- Phonological Memory Component Scores (PMCS)
- The Rapid Symbolic Naming Composite Score (RSNCS)
- Rapid Non-Symbolic Naming Composite Score (RNNCS)
- The Alternate Phonological Awareness Composite Score (APACS)
Subtests:
-
- Elision
- Blending Words
- Sound Matching
- Phoneme Isolation
- Blending Nonwords
- Segmenting Nonwords
- Memory for Digits
- Nonword Repetition
- Rapid Digit Naming
- Rapid Letter Naming
- Rapid Color Naming
- Rapid Object Naming
Administration Format: test completion and manual scoring
Total Time: 40 minutes
Reliability (US Bureau of the Census 1977, Hintze 2003):
-
- Internal Consistency: composite score reliability estimates range from 0.83 – 0.96 (PMCS-PACS), with an estimated 0.90 median.
- Test-Retest: composite score reliability estimates over a 1-year period range from 0.70 to 0.94 (RSNCS-APACS), with an estimated 0.84 median.
- Interscorer: reliability estimates ranged from 0.97 – 0.99 across all years.
Validity (US Bureau of the Census 1977, Hintze 2003):
-
- Criterion-Predictive: strong relationships with
-
- Word identification
- Word analysis
- Sight word efficiency
- Phonemic decoding efficiency
- Connected reading
-
- Construct-Identification: the CTOPP has been shown to measure three phonological processing abilities that are distinct yet correlated.
- Criterion-Predictive: strong relationships with
Available for Purchase: https://www.pearsonassessments.com/store/usassessments/en/Store/Professional-Assessments/Speech-%26-Language/Comprehensive-Test-of-Phonological-Processing-%7C-Second-Edition/p/100000737.html
supporting literature
Hintze, J., Ryan, A.L., Stoner, G. (2003) Concurrent Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills and the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. School Psychology Review, 23(4), 541-556.PDF: CTOPP – 1 – Hintze 2003
Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02796015.2003.12086220
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C. A. (1999) Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP). Assessment for Intervention, 31(2), 81-83.
PDF: CTOPP – 2 – Wagner 1999
Link: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/073724770603100207
Mitchell, J. (2001) Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 26(3), 57-63.
PDF: CTOPP – 3 – Mitchell 2001
Link: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/073724770102600305
referenced articles
Examining Shared Reading and White Matter Organization in Kindergarten in Relation to Subsequent Language and Reading Abilities: A Longitudinal InvestigationInvestigating Parental Beliefs and Home Literacy Environment on Chinese Kindergarteners’ English Literacy and Language Skills
Validation of The Reading House and Association With Cortical Thickness
Development of a Brief Screening Tool for Early Literacy Skills in Preschool Children
Maternal Reading Fluency is Positively Associated with Greater Functional Connectivity Between the Child’s Future Reading Network and Regions Related to Executive Functions and Language Processing in Preschool-Age Children